Unitary status stays an option for future

Ian Hudspeth Ian Hudspeth

THE new leader of Oxfordshire County Council has refused to rule out the idea that Oxford city could be self-governing in the future.

Ian Hudspeth said he would “look at all the options” if the idea was tabled by the Government – a position in contrast with that of his predecessor Keith Mitchell.

The county’s two-tier system of local government sees the county council responsible for issues across Oxfordshire such as education, social care and waste disposal.

There are five district councils – including Oxford City Council – that look after issues including planning, rubbish collection and parks.

But many see unitary councils, where one council has all the responsibilities in a particular area, as a cheaper alternative.

Critics say they are expensive to set up, destabilising and would never pay back the set-up costs.

Mr Hudspeth, who took up his role in May, said: “Unitary status is not something which is on the cards at the moment, but if future Governments come back and say they will accept it, we will have to look at all the options.”

But he added: “The Government has made it clear there will be no re-organisation of local authorities.

Related links

“I believe the way forward is more sharing of officers and location, and I’m keen to talk to my district and city council colleagues as well as the NHS and other organisations to see where we can save money.”

Pro-unitary Oxford City Council leader Bob Price welcomed his counterpart’s position, but also accepted unitary authorities in Oxfordshire were a long way down the road.

Oxford City Council launched a bid for unitary status in 2006.

But the idea, which supporters said would save more than £7.2m a year, was thrown out by Government in 2007 on the grounds it would be too costly and fail to deliver services.

Mr Price, a Labour councillor, said: “I think the ideal solution would be unitary authorities across the whole country, like they have in Scotland, but in the interim period I think the whole partnership structure that’s been built up since local strategic partnerships were introduced by the Labour Government in 2001 is the way to go.

“We do have this series of groups and links which provide a pretty robust and strong relationship and they have developed over the years successfully.”

Department for Communities and Local Government spokesman Sian Williams said: “One of the first acts passed by Parliament under the coalition Government was stopping the last administration’s unitary restructuring. This simply isn’t on the cards.

“The Government has however given councils new freedoms and powers to improve the way they deliver services.”

In 2006, Mr Mitchell claimed a unitary authority covering Oxford city would never pay back the set-up costs.

South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse district councils currently share senior management and services, as do West Oxfordshire and Cotswold councils, and Cherwell and South Northants councils.

Comments(5)

Thinkingoutloud says...
10:32am Mon 29 Oct 12

I would have thought a unitary council for all of oxfordshire would make the most savings - that is what Mr Hudspeth is really wishing for

Trevor Craig says...
11:43am Mon 29 Oct 12

Yup, Labour though want a "Greater Oxford" unitary council which only extends slightly outside the ring road so they maintain the electoral advantage in Oxford over the Tories. It should be decided on which way is best to deliver the most efficiency not what suits any particular party.

Andrew:Oxford says...
1:05pm Mon 29 Oct 12

A unitary authority for the whole of Oxfordshire is a brilliant idea.

It doesn't have to happen all at once. Start by transferring the HR functions across (as they tend to be the most difficult people to deal with and in most organisations are generally loved by no-one), then work the way through the departments.

Move as many roles as possible out of Oxford City Centre and into Cowley and the county towns. With congestion an ever increasing problem in the City Centre - this would remove 100s of commuter journeys into Oxford every day.

City Hall & County Hall could then be redeveloped into hotels.

EMBOX1 says...
4:50pm Mon 29 Oct 12

County Hall can be knocked down, it's ugly. But yes, consolidate services and move council offices out of the city centre.

Whilst we're at it, get rid of the district councils and flog those palaces off too. VWHDC HQ is an obscene waste of taxpayers money, and SODC isn't much better!

Gunslinger says...
9:32am Tue 30 Oct 12

It's definitely the way to go. Other historic cities like Salisbury, Chester and Durham no longer have separate district councils. And authorities like the Vale and SODC have already sold off or contracted out virtually everything anyway.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree