Drink-driving couple both caught within two hours

Witney Gazette: Patrick Ochila and Julie De La Haut outside Oxford Magistrates’ Court Patrick Ochila and Julie De La Haut outside Oxford Magistrates’ Court

A COUPLE were caught drink-driving within two hours of each other on the same city road on New Year’s Day.

Police first stopped BT worker Patrick Ochila in Oxpens Road, Oxford, shortly before 4am on January 1 and took him into custody, Oxford Magistrates’ Court heard yesterday.

His partner Julie De La Haut was in the passenger seat and told officers she would get a taxi back to their Carterton home.

But the officers who held Ochila, 31, later caught the 24-year-old driving the couple’s Nissan down the same road shortly after 5am.

The couple, of Bracken Close, Carterton, were banned from driving and fined after admitting drink-driving yesterday.

Ochila appeared in the dock first and was disqualified for 18 months and fined £375 for having 67 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath, above the legal limit of 35 micrograms.

De La Haut was banned for 20 months and fined £300 after being found with 81 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath.

Sarah Mackay, prosecuting, said police had watched De La Haut drive around the Oxpens car park before turning on to Oxpens Road with the car lights off.

But Angela Porter, defending the couple, said neither had previous convictions.

She said: “I am sure you can realise the consequences on the family will be severe. They are going to have to work out how to best manage without being able to drive.”

Both motorists also wrote letters to the magistrates in mitigation.

Presiding magistrate Roger Clarke, sentencing, told Ochila: “You come across as a decent, honest, hard-working family man so it is a great shame to see you in this position.”

When sentencing De La Haut, he said: “We appreciate you found yourself in a vulnerable position in Oxford without funds – quite a frightening position – and it is possible you didn’t think straight.

“But nevertheless your actions were dangerous.”

He added: “You have both made a mistake. It is a great tragedy, a great shame for you as a couple.”

Ochila was also told to pay £85 costs and a £37 victims’ surcharge while De La Haut was told to pay £50 costs and a £30 victims’ surcharge.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:28am Sat 18 Jan 14

Jules555 says...

No sympathy DONT drink and drive, glad they got caught!!
No sympathy DONT drink and drive, glad they got caught!! Jules555
  • Score: -24

3:30pm Sat 18 Jan 14

Hot-Dog-1 says...

Should never EVER be allowed on the road again and the fines are far too lenient. Look drink drivers up, 10 years min. Make a stand.
Should never EVER be allowed on the road again and the fines are far too lenient. Look drink drivers up, 10 years min. Make a stand. Hot-Dog-1
  • Score: -39

4:16pm Sat 18 Jan 14

riman09 says...

They committed the same type of offence; yet one is being punished more than the other? Did I miss something?
They committed the same type of offence; yet one is being punished more than the other? Did I miss something? riman09
  • Score: -88

2:35pm Sun 19 Jan 14

faatmaan says...

and their subsequent insurance to drive a car will still be cheaper than a young drivers ?
and their subsequent insurance to drive a car will still be cheaper than a young drivers ? faatmaan
  • Score: -73

7:03pm Sun 19 Jan 14

The racer says...

@ riman09

One had a higher reading than the other; disqualification periods are handed out on a sliding, though not always completely consistent, scale. Don't understand the lower fine and costs though, unless she was more straightforward to 'process' once at the station.
@ riman09 One had a higher reading than the other; disqualification periods are handed out on a sliding, though not always completely consistent, scale. Don't understand the lower fine and costs though, unless she was more straightforward to 'process' once at the station. The racer
  • Score: -84

7:50pm Sun 19 Jan 14

Man on the Green says...

The racer wrote:
@ riman09

One had a higher reading than the other; disqualification periods are handed out on a sliding, though not always completely consistent, scale. Don't understand the lower fine and costs though, unless she was more straightforward to 'process' once at the station.
Fines are calculated partly in accordance with each individual's declared means. If Ms De La Haut earned less than Mr Ochila, she would probably have been fined proportionately less ('though the amount would in all likelihood started at a higher starting point than the final result because of her higher reading, even an hour later). This may also explain the discount on prosecution costs). Each would also have benefited from a discount of up to a third depending on when in the process they pleaded guilty. If either only admitted their guilt at the last minute, they may have got as little as a 10% discount.
[quote][p][bold]The racer[/bold] wrote: @ riman09 One had a higher reading than the other; disqualification periods are handed out on a sliding, though not always completely consistent, scale. Don't understand the lower fine and costs though, unless she was more straightforward to 'process' once at the station.[/p][/quote]Fines are calculated partly in accordance with each individual's declared means. If Ms De La Haut earned less than Mr Ochila, she would probably have been fined proportionately less ('though the amount would in all likelihood started at a higher starting point than the final result because of her higher reading, even an hour later). This may also explain the discount on prosecution costs). Each would also have benefited from a discount of up to a third depending on when in the process they pleaded guilty. If either only admitted their guilt at the last minute, they may have got as little as a 10% discount. Man on the Green
  • Score: 23

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree