Headlines RSS Feed


Council's libraries proposals 'flawed'

Judith Wardle Judith Wardle

THE campaign group battling to keep Oxfordshire’s libraries has claimed County Hall’s latest plans contain “major gaps and unfounded claims”.

Save Oxfordshire Libraries was formed earlier this year, when 20 branches were at risk of losing their funding.

After a council u-turn, County Hall’s latest proposals would see the entire network saved but many of the 43 branches left relying on volunteers to help staff them.

The pressure group has criticised the the plans, saying they are “unfair to rural communities” and the proposals were based on “weak evidence.”

Members of the group have asked for full costings of recruiting, training and managing volunteers, details of how responsibilities would be divided between volunteers and professional staff, and information on whether any alternative plans have been costed by the council.

Chairman Judith Wardle said: “Save Oxfordshire Libraries would like to offer its own proposals, and the consultation asks for people’s own ideas.

“But we need information from the council to make this possible.

“We have nothing against volunteers, but they should be working with professional staff, not instead of professional staff.”

The group has sent nine questions and requests for information through to the council.

Its analysis of the authority’s proposal concludes: “The council’s proposal is based on poorly referenced and explained data, on figures and a methodology that are seriously flawed, and falls below a standard for a public consultation document.”

It has also asked whether outsourcing the running of the service to American firm LSSI is still under consideration in the longer term.

Council leader Keith Mitchell previously told the Oxford Mail it had been ruled out for the short term because LSSI had no experience in the UK, but added that the option could be revisited in the future.

Council spokesman Marcus Mabberley said: “Oxfordshire County Council has a plan to keep all 43 libraries open while still making some savings to contribute to the difficult task of saving £119m over coming years.

"These proposals are under consultation and they are the council’s response to feedback received during the first part of 2011.

“Save Oxfordshire Libraries has responded to the consultation and have also asked some questions. We welcome their comments and will respond to their questions in due course.”

To have your say on the council’s libraries proposals, go online at oxfordmail.co.uk, email letters@oxfordmail.co.uk or write to Letters to the Editor, Oxford Mail, Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 0EJ

Comments(15)

Lord Peter Macvay says...
8:28pm Wed 13 Jul 11

We are all getting tired of you lot. Take the council to court and sort it out. STOP wasting our time and money on your silly little games. Get your money and challenge in the High Court. Otherwise SHUT UP. There are so many things that our council need to concentrate on other than silly little people.

ItscalledspinIcallitlying says...
1:32am Thu 14 Jul 11

Lord Peter Macvay wrote:
We are all getting tired of you lot. Take the council to court and sort it out. STOP wasting our time and money on your silly little games. Get your money and challenge in the High Court. Otherwise SHUT UP. There are so many things that our council need to concentrate on other than silly little people.
An internet warrior who only uses the 'court' of the comments page to condemn telling people to shut up and go to court.

You couldn't make it up.

hesperus says...
5:20am Thu 14 Jul 11

Libraries should be one of the most protected items on the agenda. They provide a resource that is without question vital. We talk of educating the people yet some refuse to accept their need for access to books. We need libraries to encourage reading and allow people to learn what books they like. They are essential and should be properly funded and staffed.

Porphyro says...
9:13am Thu 14 Jul 11

Has it occurred to the good Lord Peter that there are many of us who would prefer not to encounter his frequent misguided contributions that serve mainly to confirm his lack of any discernible qualification to hold forth? He would be well advised to follow his own advice to the library campaigners and desist. If not, he only confirms his own inadequacy every time he posts.

riman09 says...
2:30pm Thu 14 Jul 11

It is easier to claim one's biased views of others' fighting spirit is a reflection of the majority perspective. In this case it appears not to be.

These cuts are not thought through at all, because they are based on unfounded assumptions of an army of volunteers waiting to take over schools, libraries, hospitals, care homes, charities and whatever more.

Nothing could be further from the truth. There are no armies out there with nothing to do. Besides, volunteering costs money, as someone has to meet the cost of administration and travel.

Lord Peter Macvay says...
6:44pm Thu 14 Jul 11

Porphyro wrote:
Has it occurred to the good Lord Peter that there are many of us who would prefer not to encounter his frequent misguided contributions that serve mainly to confirm his lack of any discernible qualification to hold forth? He would be well advised to follow his own advice to the library campaigners and desist. If not, he only confirms his own inadequacy every time he posts.
Words of too many syllables there matey for me to understand. Any chance of re-posting in plain England. Seeing as they are closing my library I have no chance of improving my In-ger-land comprehension.

Porphyro says...
10:55pm Thu 14 Jul 11

Lord Peter Macvay wrote:
Porphyro wrote:
Has it occurred to the good Lord Peter that there are many of us who would prefer not to encounter his frequent misguided contributions that serve mainly to confirm his lack of any discernible qualification to hold forth? He would be well advised to follow his own advice to the library campaigners and desist. If not, he only confirms his own inadequacy every time he posts.
Words of too many syllables there matey for me to understand. Any chance of re-posting in plain England. Seeing as they are closing my library I have no chance of improving my In-ger-land comprehension.
Nope.

ItscalledspinIcallitlying says...
11:18pm Thu 14 Jul 11

Lord Peter Macvay wrote:
Porphyro wrote:
Has it occurred to the good Lord Peter that there are many of us who would prefer not to encounter his frequent misguided contributions that serve mainly to confirm his lack of any discernible qualification to hold forth? He would be well advised to follow his own advice to the library campaigners and desist. If not, he only confirms his own inadequacy every time he posts.
Words of too many syllables there matey for me to understand. Any chance of re-posting in plain England. Seeing as they are closing my library I have no chance of improving my In-ger-land comprehension.
Yeah, I think he's saying he's a fcuking tw4t.

King Joke says...
10:02am Fri 15 Jul 11

Nooooo... long live Lord McVay, shooting down his ill-informed and often nasty comments provides me with a welcome diversion from the day's other rigours.

Lord Peter Macvay says...
4:18am Sat 16 Jul 11

King Joke wrote:
Nooooo... long live Lord McVay, shooting down his ill-informed and often nasty comments provides me with a welcome diversion from the day's other rigours.
And if I actually had daily rigours, I would return the complement.

Lord Peter Macvay says...
4:20am Sat 16 Jul 11

King Joke wrote:
Nooooo... long live Lord McVay, shooting down his ill-informed and often nasty comments provides me with a welcome diversion from the day's other rigours.
P.S. You didn't used to be the Burger KING guy did you? Whopper wiv cheese etc?

ItscalledspinIcallitlying says...
9:09am Sat 16 Jul 11

Lord Peter Macvay wrote:
King Joke wrote:
Nooooo... long live Lord McVay, shooting down his ill-informed and often nasty comments provides me with a welcome diversion from the day's other rigours.
P.S. You didn't used to be the Burger KING guy did you? Whopper wiv cheese etc?
You're wounded and struggling now Peter and everyone can see it.

Lord Peter Macvay says...
4:08am Sun 17 Jul 11

ItscalledspinIcallit
lying
wrote:
Lord Peter Macvay wrote:
King Joke wrote:
Nooooo... long live Lord McVay, shooting down his ill-informed and often nasty comments provides me with a welcome diversion from the day's other rigours.
P.S. You didn't used to be the Burger KING guy did you? Whopper wiv cheese etc?
You're wounded and struggling now Peter and everyone can see it.
Struggling yes, but not wounded yet, the fourth bottle of Sancerre is kicking in and I think I will miss sunday club in the S.W.C.

Lord Peter Macvay says...
4:09am Sun 17 Jul 11

P.S. The Joker must have been the King Whopper bloke, he hasn't replied, or are you one in the same icallitlying.

ItscalledspinIcallitlying says...
12:00am Mon 18 Jul 11

Someone please call resus or put this poor boy out of our misery.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree