No UK comment on Charles furore

Witney Gazette: The Prince of Wales tries on Google Glass on the final day of his trip to Canada. The Prince of Wales tries on Google Glass on the final day of his trip to Canada.

British diplomats have refused to discuss reports that the Prince of Wales compared Russian president Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler with the country's representatives despite Moscow's angry response to Charles's comments.

Foreign Office official Sian MacLeod told Russian deputy ambassador Alexander Kramarenko she "could not be expected to comment upon reports of private conversations" and instead discussed the volatile situation in Ukraine.

The Prince's comment that "Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler" was made to made to 78-year-old Marienne Ferguson during a visit to Canada with the Duchess of Cornwall and was thought to be a reference to Russia's annexation of Crimea and the ongoing instability in Ukraine.

A Foreign Office statement on the meeting between Ms MacLeod and Mr Kramarenko this afternoon made no further reference to the Prince's comments.

A spokesman's comments instead focused on the situation in Ukraine, calling on Russia to "restrain those responsible for violence and disorder" and condemning Moscow's actions ahead of this weekend's presidential elections.

The spokesman said: "This weekend, the Ukrainian people will vote in one of the most important elections in their history. As the Foreign Secretary has repeatedly made clear, they have the right to choose their own government in a free and fair election and Russia must exercise its influence to restrain those responsible for violence and disorder.

"People and governments across the world strongly condemn Russia's actions in Ukraine including the illegal annexation of Crimea, and the provoking of instability on the territory of a sovereign neighbour.

"The UK urges Russia to step back from actions that cause instability and conflict, and lead to international condemnation: continued instability in Ukraine is in no-one's long term interests."

Meanwhile, a statement issued earlier by the Russian embassy in London denounced the Prince's comment as "outrageous".

And Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said that Moscow "noted media reports quoting Prince Charles's statement, which he reportedly made during a private conversation on a trip to Canada".

He added: "If these words indeed were said, they don't befit a future British monarch."

The Prince's comments are particularly sensitive for the Russian Federation, which suffered terrible losses fighting Hitler, and come weeks after its annual Victory Day celebrations marking Germany's capitulation to the Soviet Union in the Second World War.

Charles is due to meet Mr Putin at commemorations for the 70th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy on June 6.

Prime Minister David Cameron declined to comment on the Prince's reported remark except to say that "everyone is entitled to their private opinions".

But Labour leader Ed Miliband said Charles "has got a point" and suggested many Britons shared the Prince's concerns about Mr Putin's actions in Ukraine.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said Charles was "free to express himself".

"People can make different comparisons from different periods of history if they wish," he said.

"All I would say is that, right now, I think the behaviour of Putin is not only menacing to Ukraine but it is very destabilising for Europe more generally.

"That is why we continue to say to the Russians, continue to say to Vladimir Putin: 'Step back, de-escalate. It's not in Russia's interests, let alone anybody else's, to continue ratcheting up this tension'."

But UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, who has previously expressed his admiration for the Russian president, rejected the comparison to Hitler.

"The difference, I think, is that, right from the very start, Hitler was expansionist and we haven't seen much evidence of that until now from Putin, and arguably what's happened in the Ukraine is because he's been poked with a stick by the rest of the world," he said.

A spokesman for Clarence House said: "We do not comment on private conversations. But we would like to stress that the Prince of Wales would not seek to make a public political statement during a private conversation."

Clarence House declined to comment on the Russian Embassy's remarks.

"We have no further comment to make at this stage," a spokeswoman said.

Charles is back in the UK after flying home from Canada.

His next official public engagement is on Saturday, when he is due to attend the Music In Country Churches concert at the Church of St Peter and St Paul in Northleach, Gloucestershire.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:27pm Thu 22 May 14

varteg1 says...

Time Charlie took his Mam's example and kept his comments to bland remarks,

Mind you, why Vlad should be concerned about comments from a minor nobody on the world stage is incomprehensible.
Time Charlie took his Mam's example and kept his comments to bland remarks, Mind you, why Vlad should be concerned about comments from a minor nobody on the world stage is incomprehensible. varteg1
  • Score: -2

7:01pm Thu 22 May 14

fixit45 says...

Why should Prince Charles not have an opinion, if free speech was abolished then we would have descended into a dictatorship and we would be no better than Russia
Why should Prince Charles not have an opinion, if free speech was abolished then we would have descended into a dictatorship and we would be no better than Russia fixit45
  • Score: 1

7:48pm Thu 22 May 14

Katie Re-Registered says...

""The difference, I think, is that, right from the very start, Hitler was expansionist and we haven't seen much evidence of that until now from Putin, and arguably what's happened in the Ukraine is because he's been poked with a stick by the rest of the world," he said."

Yeah, and the SIMILARITY is that Hitler also scapegoated and persecuted LGBTQ people, with his gangs of supporters also assaulting us in the street and then enacting anti-LGBTQ laws finally rounding up millions of LGBTQ people into death camps.

At the time this was happening there were also appeasers like you Mr Farage who preferred to stick their heads in the sand, or were too lily-livered to stand up to foreign dictators - or even served (like Mosely) as a fifth column making excuses for them and acting treacherously as their propaganda arm. I believe the derogatory term for such individuals once their countries inevitably became occupied was Quisling.

Yes, trust the unpatriotric Nigel Farage to show his true colours and stick up for Putin's Russia instead of Britain. Since we now know that his loyalties are so obviously with Russia instead of Great Britain why doesn't he go live over there with his Kremlin 'comrades'?
""The difference, I think, is that, right from the very start, Hitler was expansionist and we haven't seen much evidence of that until now from Putin, and arguably what's happened in the Ukraine is because he's been poked with a stick by the rest of the world," he said." Yeah, and the SIMILARITY is that Hitler also scapegoated and persecuted LGBTQ people, with his gangs of supporters also assaulting us in the street and then enacting anti-LGBTQ laws finally rounding up millions of LGBTQ people into death camps. At the time this was happening there were also appeasers like you Mr Farage who preferred to stick their heads in the sand, or were too lily-livered to stand up to foreign dictators - or even served (like Mosely) as a fifth column making excuses for them and acting treacherously as their propaganda arm. I believe the derogatory term for such individuals once their countries inevitably became occupied was Quisling. Yes, trust the unpatriotric Nigel Farage to show his true colours and stick up for Putin's Russia instead of Britain. Since we now know that his loyalties are so obviously with Russia instead of Great Britain why doesn't he go live over there with his Kremlin 'comrades'? Katie Re-Registered
  • Score: 0

12:13pm Fri 23 May 14

varteg1 says...

fixit45 wrote:
Why should Prince Charles not have an opinion, if free speech was abolished then we would have descended into a dictatorship and we would be no better than Russia
He has as Much right as anyone to voice his opinions, but only on an individual basis, He represents no one but himself, but when in his capacity as a member of the Royal family he makes controversial comments about another nations leader, he is treading on very thin political ice. Not that his comments carry much weight apart from a degree of embarrassment for OUR leadership, hence their reluctance to get involved.

Hague and Camoron can cause enough embarrassment without any help from Charlie.
[quote][p][bold]fixit45[/bold] wrote: Why should Prince Charles not have an opinion, if free speech was abolished then we would have descended into a dictatorship and we would be no better than Russia[/p][/quote]He has as Much right as anyone to voice his opinions, but only on an individual basis, He represents no one but himself, but when in his capacity as a member of the Royal family he makes controversial comments about another nations leader, he is treading on very thin political ice. Not that his comments carry much weight apart from a degree of embarrassment for OUR leadership, hence their reluctance to get involved. Hague and Camoron can cause enough embarrassment without any help from Charlie. varteg1
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree