Bids to construct four solar farms spark angry reaction

Witney Gazette: How the solar farms might take shape How the solar farms might take shape

SOLAR farms which could power an extra 18,000 homes, covering 405 acres of Oxfordshire countryside, have been branded “madness”.

Plans for four new solar farms have all emerged over the past month which would cover an area the size of 225 football pitches.

The power would be fed into the National Grid and be distributed to homes across the UK.

But while some residents have praised Oxfordshire’s potential green contribution, others have labelled the projects – which involve sites near Steventon, Chilton, Culham and at Barnard Gate, between Eynsham and Witney – a waste of good farmland.

Oxfordshire Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) member Michael Tyce said: “There shouldn’t be any in Oxfordshire, because of the damage they do, with such little result.

“It's not sunny enough in England – they produce tiny amounts of electricity and cover acres and acres of countryside.

“And it is madness to take land out of useful food production and cover it in solar panels.”

He put the boom in solar panel projects down to financial incentives offered by the Government in 2010.

But East Hendred Parish Council chairman John Sharp said the county should play its part in producing renewable energy. The village lies close to the Chilton and Steventon sites.

He said: “It is unusual to have two so close together, but in general I support the plans.

“In principle we welcome renewable energy in the village. Although we have yet to assess the visual impact, it is likely to be considerably less than a wind farm.”

Mr Sharp is a shareholder in the existing Westmill Solar farm, near Watchfield, which was built in 2011 across 30 acres and powers 1,400 homes. It was the first community-owned solar farm in the UK.

In January plans for a 50,688-panel solar farm on 74 acres of farmland on the edge of Oxford at Barton were dropped after community opposition.

But work on another huge solar farm is due to start this year. The 80,262-panel project on a 93-acre field between Ambrosden and Merton was approved by Cherwell District Council in February.

Council member James Macnamara said: “Whilst in favour of renewable energy, I do not think it is suitable for rural land – there are lots of sites elsewhere, like warehouse roofs – that are the right place for them.”

THE PROJECTS

  • Of the four solar farms planned, only the backers of the project at Steventon have put in a formal planning application. It is for land at Hill Farm, across fields covering 79 acres – the size of 26 football pitches – and powering 3,500 homes. The Vale of White Horse District Council is due to either approve or reject the proposal by October 11.
  • The project at Chilton is the largest of the four schemes and would cover 225 acres – 125 football pitches – powering up to 7,500 homes.
  • The Culham solar park would be built next to Culham Science Park, off Abingdon Road, covering 37 acres – an area the size of 20.5 football pitches – and powering up to 3,000 homes.
  • Plans for solar panels at Salutation Farm, Barnard Gate, just north of the A40 between Eynsham and Witney, would cover 64 acres – 35.5 football pitches – to power 4,000 homes. 

The schemes at Culham, Chilton and Barnard Gate have not yet been submitted as formal planning applications. Details of the Baranrd Gate scheme went on display to the public yesterday. Solarcentury, the company behind the plans for the park at Salutation Farm, held a consultation event at Eynsham Village Hall.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:30pm Sat 17 Aug 13

Arkright says...

There's already one on the Shelswell Park estate, doesn't appear to have a negative impact there.
There's already one on the Shelswell Park estate, doesn't appear to have a negative impact there. Arkright

5:43pm Sun 18 Aug 13

The Headington Harridan says...

ok, so the same people that say we cannot rely on fossil fuels, and campaign non-stop against nuclear power, also do not want wind or solar power, how about all these anti everythings actually say what they DO want in regards to power generation, instead of objecting to everything. Now that would be a novelty.
ok, so the same people that say we cannot rely on fossil fuels, and campaign non-stop against nuclear power, also do not want wind or solar power, how about all these anti everythings actually say what they DO want in regards to power generation, instead of objecting to everything. Now that would be a novelty. The Headington Harridan

8:57am Mon 19 Aug 13

PDplum says...

We tried to get nuclear power and the Nimby hippies protested that as unethical and dangerous.

We tried to get solar power and the Nimby hippies protested that as an eye sore to britains green and pleasant land

We tried to get fracking and the Nimby hippies protested that for reasons not really made clear.

WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO YOU EVEN PROTEST USING OIL

grr makes me so angry
We tried to get nuclear power and the Nimby hippies protested that as unethical and dangerous. We tried to get solar power and the Nimby hippies protested that as an eye sore to britains green and pleasant land We tried to get fracking and the Nimby hippies protested that for reasons not really made clear. WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO YOU EVEN PROTEST USING OIL grr makes me so angry PDplum

11:38pm Mon 19 Aug 13

caversfield says...

any comments whether for or against any subject on here is disliked. maybe these dislikers should stop reading the Bicester advertiser or more likely it's a bug.
any comments whether for or against any subject on here is disliked. maybe these dislikers should stop reading the Bicester advertiser or more likely it's a bug. caversfield

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree